Is Your Child Likely To Be A Psychopath?

Image

The detection and possible determination of potential psychopathy in children is a controversial subject that has only recently come to rise in the modern day. Biological abnormalities, parental influences, genetic inheritance and past events that could contribute to anti-social behaviour, are a few of the many ideas and theories that surround detecting psychopathy in children. 

Scientific studies have shown significant differences in brains of psychopaths. Through multiple brain scans (MRI and FMRI), it has been suggested that psychopathy originates in abnormalities in the amygdala in the brains limbic system. Considering the amygdala is in control of fear and aggression, it is no surprise that psychopaths are extremely violent and show no remorse or sorrow for their actions. This abnormality can be obtained through genetic inheritance from parents, mutation in genes and internal damage. This biological study could be the root of psychopathy. 

As found by Neo-Freudian Alfred Adler, parental influence has a clear impact on that of the child and in particular their personality. It is possible, as Adler suggested, that children that are particularly neglected or abused are more likely to participate in anti-social, violent behaviours. This is executed in a documentary called “Child of Rage: A Story Of Abuse” about a girl named Beth Thomas, who was sexually abused by her biological father as a child and consequently suffered from reactive attachment disorder. Growing up in a foster home, Beth portrayed extremely psychopathic behaviours, such as killing birds, attempting to kill her brother, and short but large bursts of rage. It is possible that this early event contributed to Beth’s psychopathic behaviours as a young child. However, despite her psychopathic traits, Beth received intensive treatment and now works as a paediatric nurse whilst also giving talks on her childhood trauma. 

Sibling rivalry is also a major contributor, and possible reason for psychopathy. This is particularly seen in that of first born children who feels a lack of attention after the second child is born (this can be related to that of Adler’s birth order theory). It is natural to be concerned about a change in the first borns behaviour when having a second child. There will of course be a decrease in attention, which may cause the child to act out in typically psychopathic manners to receive this attention. This could result in psychopathic behaviours, however can be easily taken into hand in advance, educating and informing the child on the new coming brother or sister. It is important to assure that child that nothing will change, and that equal amounts of attention will be distributed, as well as special parent-child time allocated.

It is no doubt that psychopathic tendencies can even arise in childhood, and many parents are often in despair about how to handle their “problem child”. It is important to address the issue immediately and professionally, often through the use of therapy and allowing the child to speak out about how they feel.   

There are many factors that contribute to the development of psychopathy, particularly from that of a young age. It is incredibly important to recognise, and to consider that despite factors present, it does not set in stone that the child will become a psychopath. Psychopathy is often triggered. No one is born a psychopath. You may be born with psychopathic traits or brain abnormalities that can lead to psychopathy, but may only occur if triggered by such an event as abuse, or some sort of significant traumatic event. 

Is It Possible To Determine Whether A Child Is Likely To Grow Up To Be A Psychopath? Part 2

April 9th 2014 – Annotated Bibliography Part 2

Kahn J 2012, Can You Call A 9-Year-Old A Psychopath?, viewed 9/4/14 <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/13/magazine/can-you-call-a-9-year-old-a-psychopath.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0> 

Kahn examines the case study of problem child Michael, who has exhibited strange psychopathic behaviours since the age of three, detailing the the parents’s struggle. The article examines the child in detail whilst providing background information on possible psychiatry treatments and therapy. Kahn considers a large range of views, from internal (neurological defects) to external (sibling influences) possibilities. 

Despite Kahn informing the reader explicitly, the article is biased due to Kahn’s authorial presence in the text, regarding her own views on Michael. Kahn is nor a psychologist or scientist, and therefore is not qualified to make claims and presumptions about the case. The text is long due to unnecessary information included and becomes clunky to read. 

The article considers inheritance of psychopathy and transmission through genes, which most other sources do not. Despite the clear bias present in the text, Kahn gives a variety of views and possible theories, overall making the text informative. 

Condliffe J 2012, Can Children Ever Be Diagnosed As Psychopaths?, viewed 9/4/14 <http://gizmodo.com/5910016/can-children-ever-be-diagnosed-as-psychopaths> 

Condliffe provides a concise text on identifying psychopathic traits, testing for psychopathy and the controversy around the topic of psychopathic children. The text examines particular psychologists and scientists who argue both sides of the argument: whether psychopathy can or cannot be examined through the brain, and if so, can it be detected in children of a young age. 

Despite the text being written in an understandable colloquial language, the text is not explicit, lacking key information. This affects the readers knowledge of the subject. 

The text considers the different arguments of whether psychopathy does or does not exist, and if it is possible to be detected by that of science. The text however does not consider in detail children and psychopathy, possible therapies/treatments or social and cultural/parental influences. Overall the text lacks in information, allowing for the reader not properly being informed.